Food - Primary Cause of Most Ailments
13th Jan 1999
Kirti Betai @nde.vsnl.net.in
From: Kirti Betai
Greetings and Radhasoami.
Human body decomposes within a few hours of death. We all know that.
Similarly every life form - plants, birds, animals decompose within a few
hours of death.
Decomposed food has negative energy - meaning - it will cause Energy
Depletion instead of providing energy to your body.
Food products do not taste or smell FOUL until over 50% decomposition
takes place.
Most packaged foods carry a warning : permitted preservatives & Colours &
flavors & nutrients added
Preservatives - Colours - flavors & nutrients have to be added to hide or
compensate for the deteriorating nutrition value, taste and smell as the
food decomposes EVEN INSIDE VACUME PACKED OR NITROGENIZED CONTAINERS.
This notice is so worded that its real meaning is hidden. The real meaning
is - BEWARE - YOU ARE ABOUT TO CONSUME A POTENTIALLY HAZARDOUS FOOD
PRODUCT WHICH IS PARTIALLY DECOMPOSED & WILL NOT BE FIT FOR HUMAN
CONSUMPTION ON OR AFTER _________.
After the expiry date the food would have decomposed to such an extent
that even the additives will not be able to hide its bad odor (bacteria
formation) or poor taste.
Until it reaches the stage where it may kill people (most deadly bacteria
E-Colli) it is in varying stages of decomposition (with directly
proportionate health hazard) over a period.
As the adverse effect on human health is gradual - it goes virtually
un-noticed.
Maximum health problems are related to bad food ALL OVER THE WORLD.
Decomposed Food (not Adulterated Food) is more frequently killing people
all over the world including advanced countries like the USA.
Eating even partially decomposed food may cause serious health problems
over a period.
In public interest - information about various food products is given
hereunder.
Food must be eaten :-
Within First Indicated Time In a Positive Energy Field (Vastu) Premises OR
Within Second Indicated Time In a Negative Energy Field (Vastu) Premises:-
1. Fruit 60 minutes of being cut * 15 minutes of being cut
2. Vegetables 5 hours of being cooked * 3 hours of being
cooked
3. Milk 12 hours of opening seal * 4 hours of opening seal
4. Rice 8 hours of being cooked * 4 hours of being cooked
5. Ice Cream 7 days of opening seal * 3 days of opening seal
6. Wheat 12 hours of being cooked * 5 hours of being cooked
7. Bread 5 hours of opening seal * 2 hours of opening seal
8. Lentils 24 hours of being cooked * 6 hours of being cooked
9. Tomato Sauce 30 days of opening seal * 7 days of
opening seal
10. Cheese 15 days of opening seal * 3 days of opening seal
11. Potato Chips 4 hours of opening seal * 15 minutes of
opening seal
12. Corn Flakes 15 days of opening seal * 3 days of opening
seal
13. Nuts 30 days of opening seal * 7 days of opening seal
14. Non-Dairy Sweets 12 hours of being cooked * 4 hours of
being cooked
Kirti Betai
www.cosmopathy.org.in (opening shortly)
Pyramid Energy Systems - Pendulum Querying Systems -
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
14th Jan 1999
[email protected]
Hi Kirti,
Your mail - quite interesting but equally frightening! As more and more
ladies go for work, they cook food - to be consumed normally in one day.
But according to your message, it is not safe. Considering the fact that
still Indian men are quite against the idea of sharing the kitchen work,
I feel that your message is certainly going to put pressure on poor ladies
who really cares for family's health.
Anyway thanks for throwing some light on this fact.
Durga
15th Jan 1999
Udhay Shankar N @pobox.com
There is no need to get frightened on the basis of one unsubstantiated
message. Note that I am not saying the author is wrong. It is just that
sweeping claims without citations or evidence leave me less than
impressed.
Udhay
~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*
Udhay Shankar N, Bangalore, India
http://www.pobox.com/~udhay
finger for public key
17th Jan 1999
cosmic energy @nde.vsnl.net.in
Instead of picking some knowledge, we are habitual of discouraging those
who give new information. Who will deny the fact that canned food is not
good for consumption. If one is in rush for earning money ignoring the
health, he/she will certainly be going for canned food but at least such
information do alert the buyers to minimise such consumption. Don't you
see ladies are developing a habit of purchasing tinned food as these are
easily available at the doorstep. Purchasing junk food from the so called
super markets in Western pattern, it is becoming a status symbol in our
intellectual society. If Mr so and so is not impressed, does it make any
difference. What evidence is required when one who is expressing the views
has an AURA showing upset gall bladder(result of junk food - I suppose!)
and depression in medulla oblongata of the brain.
Seema,
1st Year student Psychology &
Reiki Master
18th Jan 1999
Udhay Shankar N @pobox.com
Dear
>Seema,
>1st Year student Psychology &
>Reiki Master,
I found your response somewhat confusing, but I shall attempt to respond
to a couple of points, as this is an important issue -- one of presenting
an argument credibly.
>From: cosmic energy
>Instead of picking some knowledge, we are habitual of discouraging those
>who give new information.
I have no axe to grind, and no interest whatsoever in either encouraging
or discouraging anybody. With that poignant disclaimer out of the way,
permit me to say the following: I will do you the courtesy of assuming
that you actually believe what you have written. Therefore, you should, in
theory, be interested in airing your views in the most effective manner.
Presenting wild claims without either evidence or pointers to evidence,
(as the earlier poster did) does not do very much for the credibility of
said argument. Flaming somebody who points that out merely piles on the
fuel.
<snip>
>If Mr so and so is not impressed, does it make any difference.
Absolutely none.
> What evidence is required when one who is expressing the views
>has an AURA showing upset gall bladder(result of junk food - I suppose!)
>and depression in medulla oblongata of the brain.
HUH ??? However I try to parse this, a non sequitur results. What was that
again about effective communication ? And the search for truth ? I quote
from a post made to another list by Tim King:
<quote>
I believe there is an answer to the dilemma. Objectivity. This sounds
simple enough, but it's hard to find. I need to know my own limitations.
To step outside of my own self-interest. To be willing to discard
everything I believe in, if it means accepting reality. I need to admit
that I'm basically an ignoramus. And no one likes to be an ignoramus.
</quote>
Indeed.
Udhay
~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*
Udhay Shankar N, Bangalore, India
http://www.pobox.com/~udhay
finger for public key
