Flooding the ERP (SAP, PS, Oracle Apps) Job Market
8th March 1999 Sriram N. A. @pcm.bosch.de
-- quote -- Yesterday's hot opportunity turns into today's nightmare as corporate India closes its doors, says Manish Khanduri. It's cracked wide open. The lure that made thousands of professionals and students dream of huge salaries and exciting job opportunities has proved a mirage. Two years ago Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) was the hottest employment opportunity for professionals in fields as diverse as soft goods, steel and pharmaceuticals. They spent millions on full-time training from institutes that promised astronomical dollar salaries in the West. Most, Including 40-50 year-old professionals, quit safe, well-paid jobs in a time of recession to gamble on the future. Today, many are still unemployed. Don't believe what you're reading? Consider these facts and remember some of the figures are under-estimates: *Industry estimates suggest that 7,000-8,000 people, or some 50 per cent of India's trained ERP manpower, are jobless. That number is climbing. Some have been jobless for more than a year. *Industry observers say almost 90 per cent of ERP school-trained candidates who today apply for ERP-related appointments are unemployable and will never get a job. *Four months ago IT major Wipro had a job requirement for four ERP trained professionals, 1,500 people applied. *A fledgling ERP startup in Delhi recently advertised for ERP professionals. Around 1,200 turned up in Mumbai alone; eight were hired there. Thousands of professionals are reaping a bitter harvest after the manic seed of ERP was sown in India two years ago. The reasons for this include a boom-driven oversupply, a slowdown in corporate demand and a complete lack of genuinely qualified personnel. There's no hope of change - not with people between the ages of 25 and 50 roaming jobless, offering to work at ERP implementation for a pittance and sometimes, says Satish Doshi, managing director of IT placement company, Sampoorna Computer People, "for nothing at all". Doshi gets 300-400 ERP-related CVs every month and finds only 5 per cent of them worth his while. Another IT placement consultant, Anil Divate of Fidelity IT Jobs, says, "I have a thousand CVs of ERP-qualified candidates. Only 20 are placeable. The crux lies in the changing nature of overseas demand, and the unrelenting logic of Indian markets. Two years ago the basic two or three months training at an ERP institute in India could have qualified you for a job abroad. "Foreign companies were then desperate for trained manpower, any manpower," recounts Divate. Today? "Don't even think about it," he warns. In other words, if you don't have hands-on experience of an ERP project, you have no chance of getting a job abroad. And perhaps not even in India. For placement agencies such as Sampoorna and Fidelity, six months of experience is the bare minimum requisite demanded of a Candidate. For most ERP-trained hopefuls, this is proving an insurmountable obstacle. You can't get that job abroad if you do not have implementation experience, and getting that in India is becoming well-nigh impossible. Rajesh Tolia, runs a computer and ERP training institute, Karox Technologies: "Companies now ask for people with experience of at least two or three projects but the point is where do you get such experience, since so few companies use SAP (one of three major providers of ERP solutions)?" An official at Datamatics Corporation, a Mumbai-based placement agency, says their success ratio in placement has been one in 100. It's hard to explain why this is happening. Indeed, studies of ERP-related job opportunities look good. A recent Nasscom study says in 1998-99 the ERP services market in India is expected to gross Rs 520 crore (Rs 100 crore = Rs 1 billion) over Rs 280 crore the year before. By 2001, the report expects ERP-based billings to gross Rs 18,000 crore. Observers say ERP implementation in India could be slowing as priorities change. Vivek Kulkarni, senior manager, BaaN Company, one of the Big Three solutions providers, acknowledged that "there has been a slowdown in 1998. I think it's because companies are currently more involved in Y2K projects". Others suggest that the reality never was anywhere near as rosy as the statistics projected in the first place. Indraneel Mukerjee, manager marketing, SAP India, says, "For SAP it is a question of trying to take a reality check on the huge growth rates we expect rather than the other way round." It is also true, however, that ERP implementation is expensive - the bill can run into tens of crores - which could be especially tough for firms hit by recession. "We keeps hearing reports that companies have backed off from implementation because it is expensive and because in these recessionary times they do not have the money to pay for it," says Doshi. A few months ago a senior consultant with a Big Five management consultancy firm had told Business Standard that of the 150 installations then in the country "130 have run into some trouble or the other". The Lloyd Steel project is one example; according to sources in HCL Infosystems, which was implementing SAP solutions for Lloyd, the company decided to stop midway through the project. As a result, ERP pros are feeling the pinch like never before. Take Mumbai-based Suresh Iyer. He left a well-paying job at software megalith TCS in favour of an ERP course. He completed his course about three months ago, is yet to find a job, and today trains new batches at an institute he has started. He says, "The market is not yet mature enough to absorb the huge number of professionals the institutes are churning out." Today, there are an estimated 400 ERP training institutes in India, not all of them authorised licencees of SAP, BaaN or Oracle. Most of them mushroomed when ERP became the flavour of the year with corporate India promising lucrative placements. Indeed, many of them were able to place 60 to 70 per cent of their initial batches. Today, there are no guarantees. So who's doing the hiring? The recruiters' end of the market is broadly divided into two segments, the ERP implementers and the companies undergoing ERP. The first category includes the big five accounting firms, implementation partners and associate implementers. Implementation partners are companies such as Siemens and HCL Infosystems for SAP and DSQ Software for MAPICS and PRISM that have been authorised by the ERP majors (SAP or BaaN or Oracle) to implement projects. Associate implementers, such as Eastern Software Systems for Siemens, are the companies that work in tandem with implementation partners. And these people don't even want to hear from you. Ambarish Dasgupta, executive director, at PriceWaterhouseCoopers (PwC), says he gets "15 to 20 CVs a day, an equal number of telephone enquiries, not counting the e-mails from ERP professionals abroad." A S Viswanathan, director, Siemens Information Systems Limited, says his company stopped advertising more than a year ago. Very few, including companies such as HCL Infosystems and Eastern Software or Polar Software, are even willing to look at a resume that carries no implementation experience. Recruiters say most people who apply are unfit for ERP implementation in the first place . States Doshi, "Most people are unfit for the job, their training in no way qualifies them for implementation." In the two years since the mad rush for ERP began, the market is bursting at the seams with what Anil Bakht, managing director, Eastern Software Systems, says are "so-called professionals who by rights should never have been there in the first place." There is a yawning gap, recruiters and placement agents say, between someone who is "fit" for ERP and someone who isn't."Just because you have worked in finance or material management or sales doesn't mean that you can do an ERP course and become a master implementer," says Doshi. And when crores can ride on an ERP implementation no one wants to take a chance on a dubious candidate. Every organisation seems to have developed a solution to this problem. Most implementers hire people directly from industry and train them in-house. States PwC's Dasgupta, "We look at a person's functional experience, the company that he has worked for and the college he graduated from. All of these have to be top-notch. We rarely recruit anyone fresh out of college." Companies undergoing implementation, such as the Mahindras, often prefer to train their own employees. Implementers too, like PwC, Siemens and HCL Infosystems, all have their own internal training pogrammes. And yet they keep "graduating" in droves, spending lakhs on dubious ERP courses that promise them the earth. For these thousands there is no end, only a hard reality. Companies are hiring, definitely, but in dribs and drabs. For instance Wipro plans to recruit around 25 people soon, HCL Infosystem has an ongoing programme, as does Eastern Software. But it's employees in organisations implementing ERP programmes who have become a favourite target these days. Even if the job market eases, ERP "graduates" may find still themselves in a tight situation. Organisations such as Siemens plan to set up their own training schools. SAP India is soon expected to announce authorised training schools all over in collaboration with Indian partners who are yet to be named but have been identified. When that happens the market will be flooded by graduates from authorised training schools. But for the moment, hope and desperation persist. " I get calls from people," says Siemens Viswanathan, "who say they plan to withdraw their PF money and invest for their son in a training school. " What does one tell them?" -- end quote --
9th March 1999
Manish @del2.vsnl.net.in
If ERP is the past, what is the future? regards manish
10th March 1999
Harshal Jawale @it.com.pl
E-Commerce !
10th March 1999
Srinath Srinivasa @usa.net
I don't think that it is because ERP is "past" that it has turned into a nightmare. It looks like a straight case of demand-supply. Once there was demand, and once it became known that this demand pays well, there is too much supply. And then why not? In India, we have the tradition of following a "world order"-- remember the times when the "in" thing for a class XII student was engineering or medicine? Remember an ad some years back that said-- BSc is for staying at home, and BCom is for ...(something similar); so you have to join this course in this computer center if you want to become someone in life... If we try to bring about one single "in" thing for the whole population, I suspect we are going to see more such nightmares. When I joined engineering it was computer science that was "in", and if you were a civil engineer, you'd probably be looked down with contempt (what an irony!-- the only engineer who is "civil" is looked down upon! :-) The article cited people from so many diverse backgrounds flooding into ERP because it was "in"-- it payed in dollars, it flew them around the world. I really don't know how to solve the problem of these "hype vortices" or superficiality. They can wreck such vast havoc. How can we convince someone that their field is just as important as any other, and they are just as valuable to the system as any other, when there is such a vast difference between renumeration and perks between occupations? -srinath
10th March 1999
Jayanta @in.ibm.com
future is Supply chain management, e-business and back to Main Frame technology.......serious I indeed am!!!!!!! Have a Good Day Jayanta (IBM India) Ph: (022) 820 0463/4/6, 0454/6/7(O), (079) 6742325 (R), (Mobile): 98201 01165, e-mail : [email protected] "...some men see things as they are and ask "WHY" ; I dream things that never were and ask "WHY NOT"